Security questionnaires, answered from your own docs
Connect Notion, Drive or Confluence and Slack once. Each questionnaire comes back as a sourced draft within 48 hours. A person checks every answer, and your CTO approves it.
15hrs
for one questionnaire. Founders on Indie Hackers called it “a 15-hour job” in 2026.
Every enterprise deal brings a security questionnaire, and the deal waits for it
They run to 100–300 questions, often 2–5 a month. At a 20–150 person SaaS company the CTO usually answers them, hunting through Notion, Drive and Slack.
- “A real time-sink” Two founder threads on security questionnaires. They’ve “watched it stall deals”.
- €600 to fill in one questionnaire What one consultant charges to answer a single form for you.
- Compliance roles at $102–220K a year Answering security questionnaires is part of the job.
Connect your docs once. Each questionnaire comes back drafted.
Send us the questionnaire as the buyer sent it. We draft every answer from your own docs, a person checks it, and your CTO approves it before anything goes back.
Notion, Google Drive and Slack connected
Read to draft answers. Every questionnaire after this one draws on the same docs.
Every answer comes with its source, including product and AI questions
A policy library covers the standard questions. Buyers also ask how your product, architecture and AI features work, and those answers live in your engineering docs and Slack.
Questions212
Drafted from your docs206
For your CTO6
| Question | Draft answer | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is customer data encrypted at rest? | Yes. The production database and its backups are encrypted at rest. | Security overview · Notion | Checked |
| Which sub-processors handle customer data? | Listed with what each one does and where it runs. | Vendor list · Google Drive | Checked |
| How is customer data used by your AI features? | Sent to the model provider for each request, and not used to train models. | AI architecture · Confluence | Checked |
| How is one customer’s data kept apart from another’s? | Separate schema per customer, enforced in the API layer. | #eng-architecture · Slack | For your CTO |
| When was your last penetration test? | No date found in your docs. | Not found | For your CTO |
Sourced to your docs
Each answer points to the page, file or thread it came from.
Checked by a person
Someone on our team checks every answer against its source.
Approved by your CTO
Nothing goes back to the buyer until your CTO signs off.
The same brain then answers the rest of the company
Once your docs are connected, your staff and AI agents can ask it questions too, and every answer points back to its source.
Your docs
- Notion
- Google Drive
- Confluence
- Slack
Connected once
- Company brainsourced
Who asks it
Answers, each with its source
- SQSecurity questionnairesChecked, then approved
- STYour staffHow things work
- AIYour AI agentsThe same sources
Every answer links to the doc it came from
How teams answer questionnaires today, and where Astercurrent fits
Most CTOs answer them by hand. Some pay a consultant or hire a compliance person, and compliance platforms such as Vanta and Drata include questionnaire AI in their plans.
| Question | By handThe CTO, from Notion, Drive and Slack | A consultantPaid per form | A compliance hireA full-time role | Compliance platformsVanta, Drata | AstercurrentDone for you |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Your CTO | The consultant | Your new hire | Your team | We do |
| Answers drawn from | Whatever you can find | What you send them | Your docs, over time | Your policy library | All your connected docs |
| Product, architecture and AI questions | You write them | Varies | Varies | Varies | From your engineering docs |
| Every answer checked | By you | By them | By them | By your team | By us, then your CTO |
| Cost | About 15 hours of CTO time per form | €600 per form | $102–220K a year | Part of their plans | Early access |
Send us the questionnaire that’s holding up a deal.
Our aim is to have it back as a sourced draft within 48 hours, checked by a person and ready for your CTO to approve.
Who it’s for
- US B2B SaaS, seed to Series B, about 20 to 150 people
- Selling to bigger companies, or into healthcare, fintech or finance
- SOC 2 done or under way
Common questions
It answers your security questionnaires from your own docs. You connect Notion, Google Drive or Confluence and Slack once, send us each questionnaire as you got it, and get it back as a sourced draft within 48 hours. A person checks every answer, and your CTO approves it.
A person on our team checks every answer against its source. Anything your docs don’t answer is flagged for your CTO, and nothing goes back to the buyer until your CTO approves it.
The standard security and policy questions, plus questions about how your product, architecture and AI features work, as long as the answer is somewhere in your docs or Slack.
Our aim is a sourced draft within 48 hours of you sending each questionnaire.
We return the completed questionnaire file, and you send it to the buyer the way you normally would.
Their questionnaire features work from your policy library, which covers many of the standard questions. Astercurrent answers from all your docs, including product, architecture and AI questions, does the work for you, and has a person check every answer.
Access to the docs you connect: Notion, Google Drive or Confluence, and Slack. They’re read to draft your answers.
CTOs at US B2B SaaS companies from seed to Series B, with about 20 to 150 people. Under about 40 people it’s often the CEO or a technical founder. It fits best if you sell to bigger companies or regulated industries like healthcare, fintech and finance, and have SOC 2 or are working on it.
When a deal is stuck in security review, when they’re hiring enterprise salespeople or a first security or compliance person, right after their SOC 2 report arrives, or when they add an Enterprise plan with single sign-on.
We’re setting the price with our early-access teams. Join the waitlist and you’ll see it before you commit to anything.